<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Bring Back the 80&apos;s!</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/" />
  <modified>2008-03-13T09:25:49Z</modified>
  <tagline>This is the weblog for Jesse Thompson, who lives in Bend Oregon with his wife and son. It will probably center on cultural topics such as: geekiness, the 1980&apos;s, and geekiness. Thank u. :)</tagline>
  <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2008:/bbt8/1</id>
  <generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="2.65">Movable Type</generator>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, jesse</copyright>
  <entry>
    <title>Yo, blog be moving</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000138.html" />
    <modified>2008-03-13T09:25:49Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-13T02:25:49-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2008:/bbt8/1.138</id>
    <created>2008-03-13T09:25:49Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">What you say? A friend of mine suggested that I should host mah blog all up on Blogger. Pitch: on Blogger, comment spam is as completely non-existant as email spam is in my Gmail inbox. Now I&apos;ll get to actually...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>What you say?</p>

<p>A friend of mine suggested that I should host mah blog all up on Blogger. Pitch: on Blogger, comment spam is as completely non-existant as email spam is in my Gmail inbox.</p>

<p>Now I'll get to actually hear y'all crickets again, I missed you guys! :)</p>

<p>Later I will try and see if I can move all the actual post content from this location to that, perhaps set up some 301 redirects, just to keep things clean and consistent. We'll see.</p>

<p>Meantime, <a style='font-weight: bold; ' href='http://bbt8.blogspot.com/'>Come on in!</a></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The McDonalds Menu Song.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000135.html" />
    <modified>2007-04-25T10:03:25Z</modified>
    <issued>2007-04-25T03:03:25-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2007:/bbt8/1.135</id>
    <created>2007-04-25T10:03:25Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Circa 1986. From Memory. Why? Because I can. Big Mac, Mc-DLT, a quarter pounder with some cheese, fillet of fish, a hamburger, a cheeseburger, a happy meal, McNuggets, Tasty Golden French Fries, Regular and Larger sizes, salads: Chef or Garden...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Circa 1986. From Memory. Why? Because I can.</p>

<p>Big Mac, Mc-DLT, a quarter pounder with some cheese, fillet of fish, a hamburger, a cheeseburger, a happy meal, McNuggets, Tasty Golden French Fries, Regular and Larger sizes, salads: Chef or Garden or a Chicken Salad Oriental. Big Big Breakfast, Egg McMuffin, Hot Hotcakes and Sausage. Maybe Biscuits Bacon Egg and Cheese and Sausage Danish, hash browns too. And for dessert: hot apple pies and sundaes (three varieties!) a soft-serve cone, three kinds of shakes, and Chocolaty-Chip Cookies. And to drink: a Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, an Orange Drink, and Sprite and coffee (decaf too) a lowfat milk and orange juice.</p>

<p>I love McDonald's, Good Time Great Taste&reg; cuz' I get this all at one place.</p>

<p>Ok. When I sang this in situ for friends in 1989 they were amazed because the commercial was so old.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What I have to say about what Dave Winer has to say about JSON</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000134.html" />
    <modified>2007-02-07T22:25:59Z</modified>
    <issued>2007-02-07T14:25:59-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2007:/bbt8/1.134</id>
    <created>2007-02-07T22:25:59Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Dave Winer, inventor of XML-RPC, apparently first found out about the data format known as JSON just a couple of months ago. There were a firestorm of comments, but my comment got too long so I&apos;ve reformatted it as an...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Dave Winer, inventor of XML-RPC, apparently first found out about the data format known as <a href='http://www.json.org/'>JSON</a> just a couple of months ago. There were a firestorm of comments, but my comment got too long so I've reformatted it as an article in my blog and linked to it. I know you can't reply to me here so, I guess reply to me <a href='http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/scripting-news-for-12202006/'>there</a> instead.</p>

<p>My comment continues beyond the jump.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Valid are the comments that not everyone choses to handle data in their native languages as XML. Most people use XML as a document description language and DOM as an accessor to such documents. This is no different than using PDF to describe printable pages digitally and using some PDF library to get at the data inside. Nobody would chose to convert something that's not a PDF (like an associative array in PERL) into a PDF just to get it to another client or server and convert it back into an associative array (be the recipient JavaScript, Java, Ruby, ASP or whatever).</p>

<p>This is a long way of saying that PDF would be a bad choice of a serialization language. For the same reason, XML is also a bad choice of a serialization language. You can do many Grand Things using XML and solve many Grand Problems. I don't think I've run into any of those problems yet. I just have data in language X and want to wind up with the same data in language Y. I want a language neutral serialization format.</p>

<p>It is true that JSON can be consumed by JavaScript using eval. It is also true that as long as your receiver trusts your generator this can be a huge win. That describes 90% of your transactions: web client consuming data from it's own server. </p>

<p>But this approach is tainted by the "security concerns" given light in <a href='http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/scripting-news-for-12202006/#comment-29765'>Henry's</a> statement:<br />
> JavaScript has the equivalent of Lisp’s ‘eval’ , but not ‘read’.<br />
> And for some further unfathomable reason, nobody seems<br />
> to understand this simple yet important difference.</p>

<p>To whit, the uninitiated may try to "eval()" a JSON string meaning to unserialize harmless data, but wind up executing harmful code instead. On the browser this could be a nuisance or a security violation with attackers stealing cookie data... on the server side (using SSJS or python) attackers could conceivably try to attack your database or file system. </p>

<p>However, that by itself fails to make JSON a kludge. The fact remains that an exceedingly efficient regex will sanitize a JSON string in such a way that regex+eval() = lisp's read(). This approach is so efficient it pays to black box it and never trust eval. </p>

<p>That of course secures your JavaScript — and apparently your python. Tweak the regex a bit to pre-process into whatever object literal notation you want, and you've written a safe decoder for nearly every language which has an eval. Even LISP. </p>

<p>I take it as read that by now that Mr. Whiner knows that nobody invented JSON. JSON is in fact older than XML or XML-RPC. It was in use in a longhand form as mentioned by <a href='http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/scripting-news-for-12202006/#comment-26776'>jk</a>  since 1995. With it's shorthand format ratified by ECMA in '99, it's slowly seeped into virtually every web browser. Being older in this case means it has wider and more mature support than XMLHttpRequest and can be used to provide a greater number of end users the benefits of client side interactivity.</p>

<p>Just as XML sucks for serialization, nobody argues against the assertion that JSON sucks for document representation. When people cheer or boo about JSON "replacing" XML they are doing so assuming different domains for replacement.</p>

<p>Most of the people cheering are tired of manipulating the DOM to get a simple piece of data from what should be a simple web service, and want to replace XML's use in that domain.</p>

<p>Most of the people booing are passing complicated documents back and forth in domains and back offices I know nothing about, and are afraid of being overrun by cowboys breaking their standards and their discipline.</p>

<p>Well, David, this may come as another surprise to you, but out here in the Wild Wild West you are bound to get your boots dirty. You may have coined XML-RPC and purport to love XML and the discipline it requires — and doing so may serve your purposes famously in your clean offices trading TPS reports with various departments — but when you come out here to decry JSON in public with the italicized "IT’S NOT EVEN XML!" you do so using a web page with this doctype:</p>

<p>&lt;!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"&gt;</p>

<p>And here is what validator.w3.org has to say about your opinion:<br />
<a href='http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://scripting.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/scripting-news-for-12202006'>"This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!"</a></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Revitalizing the blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000132.html" />
    <modified>2006-05-01T13:17:36Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-05-01T06:17:36-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2006:/bbt8/1.132</id>
    <created>2006-05-01T13:17:36Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">So I&apos;m thinking of writing in the blog again. I&apos;ve an idea, but I would like input from you folks, my readers. Yes, even you, crickets of the night :) So I&apos;ll be focusing on posting links to places I...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>So I'm thinking of writing in the blog again. I've an idea, but I would like input from you folks, my readers. Yes, even you, crickets of the night :)</p>

<p>So I'll be focusing on posting links to places I find online that I think are worthwhile to showcase. Something like Slashdot or utterlyboring. However I warn you that a majority of the links I have a mind to post are of the cute-kitten variety.</p>

<p><a href='http://www.catsinsinks.com/'>Here is my first example.</a></p>

<p>I'm also thinking of figuring out how to re-enable comments without being flooded by spam. I'll keep you up to date on that one. But in the meantime, Email me (jesset at gmail period com) with your opinions on this effort. Do I need to start a different blog? (would be not much 80's going on at that point) am I being silly?</p>

<p>Thanks again and keep on showing that mouse who's boss. :)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comments Closed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000131.html" />
    <modified>2005-02-28T08:22:02Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-02-28T00:22:02-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2005:/bbt8/1.131</id>
    <created>2005-02-28T08:22:02Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Well, after maybe a month of not getting any email comment notifications from my blog, I come back to find a good 1200+ comment spam posts. I don&apos;t keep my blog up to date very much anymore, so I&apos;ve just...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Well, after maybe a month of not getting any email comment notifications from my blog, I come back to find a good 1200+ comment spam posts.</p>

<p>I don't keep my blog up to date very much anymore, so I've just closed all commenting on all my articles until I decide too.. and/or until comment spam is somehow eraticated.</p>

<p>Thank you for your support. :)</p>

<p>PS, our kitty is back home safe and sound now; he returned about 7 days after he vanished. He gave us all a fright but he hasn't done that way since then! Thanks again for your well wishes! :)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google &quot;Suggest&quot; Beta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000130.html" />
    <modified>2005-02-03T06:14:06Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-02-02T22:14:06-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2005:/bbt8/1.130</id>
    <created>2005-02-03T06:14:06Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Google Suggest Beta It&apos;s just like Google&apos;s normal search except that it autocomplete&apos;s your typing with popular search term suggestions.. complete with predicted number of hits in the dropdown! Very impressive :) It is not like Google Desktop or your...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p><A HREF='http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1'>Google Suggest Beta</A></p>

<p>It's just like Google's normal search except that it autocomplete's your typing with popular search term suggestions.. complete with predicted number of hits in the dropdown! Very impressive :)</p>

<p>It is not like Google Desktop or your own browsers' autocomplete inasmuch as keeping track of your own searches, it only suggests out of a pool of globally popular searches. I find it to be very very very *fast* considering that it calls back to the server as I type (about 1/5 of a second per character on bendcable). From a "guess what I'm about to say" perspective it is entirely phenominal. :)</p>

<p><A HREF='http://labs.google.com/suggest/faq.html'>Here is the FAQ</A></p>

<p><br />
(PS, We got our kitty back.. he just sauntered back home after about a week and a half; what nerve ;)  but now Christian is in the hospital with asthma related woes :(  )</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>2005 (?)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000129.html" />
    <modified>2005-01-19T12:48:58Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-01-19T04:48:58-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2005:/bbt8/1.129</id>
    <created>2005-01-19T12:48:58Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">We miss our spooky kitten. :( Ok, so in May 2004 I promised I wouldn&apos;t abandon my blog and leave it crying in the gutter like a lost kitten. After about a month not posting anything, and my front page...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p><DIV STYLE='float:left; display: block; border: inset #003; margin: 0 10px 10px 10px; width: 200px; '><DIV><A HREF='http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/spooky/large/spooky.jpg' TARGET='_blank'><IMG SRC='http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/spooky/thumbs/spooky.jpg' STYLE='border: 0; '></A></DIV><DIV STYLE='font:8pt/9pt sans-serif; background: white; padding: 1px 4px; border-top: 1px solid #003; '>We miss our spooky kitten. :(</DIV></DIV></p>

<p>Ok, so in May 2004 I promised I wouldn't abandon my blog and leave it crying in the gutter like a lost kitten. After about a month not posting anything, and my front page looking weird because MT refused to display anything due to new years.. what happens?</p>

<p>My real cat goes missing.</p>

<p>He has been missing for officially 3 days this morning, and we'll be putting out fliers and lost ads and such.</p>

<p><BR STYLE='clear: both; '></p>

<p>On a lighter note (the origional reason for posting actually) I found this fan video which appears to be the best example of Swift 3d for Flash I have ever seen:</p>

<p><A HREF='http://albinoblacksheep.com/flash/cometogether.php'>http://albinoblacksheep.com/flash/cometogether.php</A></p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>OMFG THIS R0XX0rZ TEH BIG ONE !!!11</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000128.html" />
    <modified>2004-12-18T09:53:09Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-12-18T01:53:09-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.128</id>
    <created>2004-12-18T09:53:09Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">This is a list of bookmarklets that stupifies me: http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/ I made a bookmarklet a few years ago that resized your window to various popular screen sizes for quickly and easily testing how layouts will look on blind people&apos;s monitors....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This is a list of bookmarklets that stupifies me:</p>

<p><A HREF='http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/'>http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/</A></p>

<p>I made a bookmarklet a few years ago that  resized your window to various popular screen sizes for quickly and easily testing how layouts will look on blind people's monitors.</p>

<p>These bookmarklets, however, accomplish the impossible, the wicked, the wickedly impossible, and then they get down to business and do things that will REALLY make you poop your pampers.</p>

<p>It's like walking through a snooty neighborhood with your own 400lb go-to guy. You can cruise around the web and change anything you want; and everyone's to afraid to say anything.</p>

<p>Cruising CNN.com and don't like their banner ads? Poof, no banner ads anywhere. Third party Iframes, embeds, plugins? Vanish like smoke in the wind. Don't want them saving your cookes? Presto, all cookies saved anywhere from a domain gone in a keystroke (instead of drilling into browser preferences somewhere).</p>

<p>Want to pause, rewind, fast forward, or even shuttle arbitrary flash movies on your favorite cartoon website? Wham-o, VCR controls! </p>

<p>color links based on whether they are in-site, off-site, or same-page. Make a page's target anchor tags magically appear. Convert a page into a topigraphical map describing it's block layout. Defeat every no-rightclick, no-select, disabled form field etc trick in the book. Sort HTML tables alphabetically!</p>

<p>Pop open a window and dictate any JS commands or CSS styles you'd like to apply to a page.. in real time! (no apply button even)</p>

<p>It just goes on and on and on..... </p>

<p>Take back the web! It's you're web :)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Corsican Rule</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000127.html" />
    <modified>2004-12-06T08:26:51Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-12-06T00:26:51-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.127</id>
    <created>2004-12-06T08:26:51Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">This is an excerpt from a novel I&apos;ve spent the last eleven years not writing: Joseph Carmon stands pale against the deep red sunset. He had never meant for this to happen, but now he knows that it is far...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This is an excerpt from a novel I've spent the last eleven years not writing:</p>

<p><BLOCKQUOTE><br />
Joseph Carmon stands pale against the deep red sunset. He had never meant for this to happen, but now he knows that it is far to late for regrets; The destiny that was chosen for him is now unmaleable. The dark shadow that stands before him; unremorseful. A cold shiver fills his entire being in the ninety some odd degree weather, nearly freezing the tears that the wind snatches from his eyes. Sore from misuse are these eyes, sore from having seen what no eyes should witness. The prophecy had been unusually cruel to his lot, and he wishes he didn't have to die with the knowledge he'd gained in the last few days. "Is ignorance really bliss?" he wonders. He will find out far too soon.</p>

<p>Kaitlyn huddles in a corner of a nearly empty motelroom, the walls of which hide her barely enough from the bloody red sunset outside. Her son Jacob is Luke Skywalker, fighting evil, jumping up and down on the bed. Her heart feels as if a lightsaber were imbedded within it. Her emotional termoil has grown to the point that she experiences physical discomfort when she breathes in as deeply as she should, so she hyperventelates in quick bursts quietly in the corner.</p>

<p>She wishes her son would run to her and hug her tightly, but something in the air today just seems to keep people apart, disconnected from one another. Some unnamable insanity that leaches soul from body nearly flows from the scarlet skyline. Perhaps it fortells the coming of nuclear winter, if not something more insidious and direct? Kaitlyn has pondered this in the past week, but sees such matters as acedemic now. She blinks her glazing eyes to look for something. What's missing? The horror in her heart finally finds completion and clarity as she glares at the now empty space above the bed, and her shriek nearly drowns out the shrieks of pain from the unfortunate soul outside.<br />
</BLOCKQUOTE></p>

<p>As a teenager I invented an idea for a story arc for a series of novels or comic books called "Corsican Rule". Driven by the whole angst-ridden-teenage-superhero type of undercurrent; borrowing ideas from the X-men, Star Trek and the Highlander; I designed dozens of characters, hundreds of events and situations and teams of interwoven subplots. </p>

<p>I commited to memory my notes for endless numbers of battles, events, alliances and betrayals. I developed the circumstances and histories of all of my characters and even half of my locations vividly enough that I could follow the story from each of their POV's. One of the most difficult things to do however, was to decide how to tell the story.</p>

<p>My cosmology lacked chronology since there was literally so much time travel and interdimentional interplay involved that there was no "beginning", no "end", and no clear order of events in between. To be entirely accurate the story arc follows an intricate loop. It had to since both the theme, and even the elementary physics of the semi-fictional universe consist of closed loops.</p>

<p>The one thing I was able to do was to sketch out the chronology of events in the life of "Joseph Carmen" mentioned above. The beginning of his story line paints a charming little causal loop 46 years long, more confusing than Memento, and oddly enough precicely fits the life-cycle of a character in Peirs Anthony's Incarnations of immortality. (I didn't find this out until after the real life date that Joseph Carmen was supposed to die, and didn't. Yeah, he was kind of based upon a real life person ;)</p>

<p>The scene mentioned here I wrote in college circa 1997 and saved to a text file. The text file got shifted around from location to location, amongst my digital baggage, and I just happened to find it hidden in an archive backup, inside a zip file, inside another archive backup, all of which I was this close -> <- to deleting :P</p>

<p>I'm pretty sure I intended it to be the opener for the book (series). You'll notice that it doesn't name or describe the antagonist(s). Neither the "force" of antagonism nor the particular perpetrator of the murder, which happen to be seperate. Of course to be fair, I never really decided exactly who the murderer was going to be. That was part of a subplot I hadn't actually worked out yet; the rest of this subplot carries on regardless of who actually dunnit.</p>

<p>But, the time and place are Greybull Wyoming, August 23rd 1999. This guy and his family have holed up in a hard to reach no-horse town while draft dodging, as the Third World War had been underway for the better part of a year. Joseph had (somehow) gotten himself mixed up in the politics of the main part of the book, which are extradimentional. He knew he would be killed, he knew the date, but he knew it had to be done.. so he allowed himself to be discovered. His wife also knew this, and understood why (better than he did for some pretty messed up reasons) but still found it to be a particularily jarring thing to experience first hand. Neither of them knew what little Jacob was up to. He was able to evade his mother's supervision and go outside. He did witness his father's murder. Luckily he wasn't discovered, and I know it's pretty macabre, but this was a formative point in his personal evolution and he is the main character of my book.</p>

<p>From a literary standpoint though, I think this snippet plays as a little desperately self-absorbed. Almost like Stephen R. Donaldson wrote it. It eschews nessessary grammar points like bothering to chop things up into sentences, as I tended to do back then. But on the other hand, I am kind of proud of the way I tossed around metaphores. Since I don't think I can do things like that anymore, I'll probably never get to finish the books ;)</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The December 2004 Internet Awards</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000126.html" />
    <modified>2004-12-03T08:30:12Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-12-03T00:30:12-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.126</id>
    <created>2004-12-03T08:30:12Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">After the spirit of the Darwin Awards, every arbitrary period of time I fire off an award to a (usually flash based) thingamajig on the internet. For example: April, 2000 &amp;#151; most important thing on the internet: Joe Cartoon, 3...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p><DIV STYLE='float:left; display: block; border: inset #003; margin: 0 10px 10px 10px; width: 300px; '><IMG SRC='http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/images/zoomquilt.jpg'></DIV>After the spirit of the Darwin Awards, every arbitrary period of time I fire off an award to a (usually flash based) thingamajig on the internet. For example:</p>

<p>April, 2000 &#151; most important thing on the internet:<br />
Joe Cartoon, 3 drunk flies. (Since the cheapskate moved back to atomfilms I can't even link directly to the cartoon anymore)</p>

<p>November, 2002 &#151; most f***ed up thing on the internet:<br />
Camp Chaos, The Greatest Story In The World part 6 (which they don't have a link of any kind to anymore)</p>

<p>And now, December 2004, most eschereque thing on the internet:<br />
[you WILL need to press F11 and view this in fullscreen, and view the flash version first..]</p>

<p>Paul Hinze et al, <A HREF='http://zoomquilt.nikkki.net/'>Zoomquilt</A>.</p>

<p>It is the first Escher-worthy thing to happen since the passing of Esher 32 years ago :)  Bravo.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Screw RIAA. Let&apos;s pay each other for music.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000125.html" />
    <modified>2004-11-23T06:46:36Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-11-22T22:46:36-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.125</id>
    <created>2004-11-23T06:46:36Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">This Wired article discusses a new music sharing technology called &quot;Weed&quot;, which proposes a striking new business model to distribute music. Instead of suing people for using P2P to disseminate music across the globe.. they&apos;ll pay you. Essentially, a &quot;weed&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p><A HREF='http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,65774,00.html'>This Wired article</A> discusses a new music sharing technology called <A HREF='http://www.weedshare.com/'>"Weed"</A>, which proposes a striking new business model to distribute music. Instead of suing people for using P2P to disseminate music across the globe.. they'll pay you.</p>

<p>Essentially, a "weed" file is a song with a <A HREF='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Rights_Management'>DRM</A>, that lets you play it for free up to three times on your computer. After that you'll have to buy it, for about a dollar per song, to keep playing it. You'll then be able to play it on up to three computers, burn it to as many CD's as you like, etc.</p>

<p>Is this reverse-compilable? Could a person evade the payment and play the song for free? I can think of a good dozen ways off the top of my head, but bear with me here.</p>

<p>What makes Weed different is that you can share the Weed file with your friends.. through P2P.. on your website.. via email.. whatever. When they get the file they can play it three times for free too. Furthermore, when you purchase a file it gets stamped with an encrypted form of your user id. When you then share the file you've purchased, you get a cut when your friends buy it. and when their friends buy it.. down to three levels deep.</p>

<p>You do have to buy the song in the first place (so you can't easily promote music you didn't also like) but since you could pass it to ten friends who also buy it, you can easily make back more money than you spent. If you're lucky you could make tons more.. But you never know who will buy so you probably shouldn't buy a song unless it's worth it ;)</p>

<p>So, let's recap here:<br />
<UL><br />
<LI>You get to preview the song leisurely and pan any/all duds.. unlike the RIAA method of promoting singles and forcing you to pay for the rest of the schlock on the album.</LI><br />
<LI>You get paid for passing the songs onto appreciative friends, or for marketing the song to strangers in your own unique idiom.</LI><br />
</UL></p>

<p>But that's not all. You would think that was enough, but no. This setup also discourages hacking in a way that no gestapo lawsuits ever could. Just think about it.. it pulls you into the distribution system. Suddenly you're not just "sticking it to the man" anymore. "The man" isn't even involved. Instead, uh, you <B>are</B> the man. If you hack a file you can't "resell" it anymore.</p>

<p>Also, instead of bringing down the RIAA through looting, you get to be their <I>competitor</I>. Instead of just keeping their mits away from your wallet, you're also safeguarding the wallets of your religious, law abiding friends. Not only does your sting bite them harder, but you can thumb your nose at their lawyers at the same time.</p>

<p>All in all it's good. Players and dj's who have more mix tapes than benjamins will find them to be equally good currency on these streets. Getting your groove on no longer has to drain off your cash, it can pay for itself. Maybe only partially, maybe with extra to spare. In fact, you'll actually be paid to know what your friends like to hear and deliver it. </p>

<p>Most won't be profit-makers. Similar to an <A HREF='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing'>MLM</A> this system by definition cannot make profit for everyone &#0151; you're money comes from somewhere. But, unlike an MLM, making profit isn't the point unless you want it to be.</p>

<p>Some people will make their own electronic shops specificly to "resell" their favorite tunes. I put this term in quotes because all of the money handling is managed by the Weed guys.. the part you help out in is targeting, of course, and the transferal of millions of bytes per file.. and they pay you for it.. and these people stand a great chance of making profit since they will work hard to actually market the material and will be properly paid for their work.</p>

<p>The "fuzzy-consumers" who simply want to listen will get some kickbacks from sharing, but mainly only when they've opened their friends' eyes to a new sound they haven't heard before. If your friends are hipper than you then they probably already have the song you want to share. So, unless you find a windfall and introduce a fresh new artist to some parched landscape, your kickbacks as a fuzzy-consumer will be discounts instead of profits. Yet they are still meaningful. They help to foster social musical understanding. They involve people in a process that gets artists fairly paid. They break down the walls between distributer and consumer, you get to sit anywhere on that continuum you want. Everyone wins.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>There&apos;s no crying in memeing!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000124.html" />
    <modified>2004-11-14T08:48:22Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-11-14T00:48:22-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.124</id>
    <created>2004-11-14T08:48:22Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Well, Tom Hanks would be confused, but I liked that scene in A League of Their Own. It&apos;s in the previews (I have yet to watch the movie :). It contains Bitty Shram. So anyhey, the title refers to Rick...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Well, Tom Hanks would be confused, but I liked that scene in A League of Their Own. It's in the previews (I have yet to watch the movie :). It contains <A HREF='http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000091.html'>Bitty Shram</A>.</p>

<p>So anyhey, the title refers to <A HREF='http://rick458.blogspot.com/'>Rick</A> chastizing <A HREF='http://deann.blogspot.com/'>DeAnn</A> in reference to <A HREF='http://deann.blogspot.com/2004/11/miss-me.html'>the blog post</A> to which this .. blog .. post .. refers.</p>

<p>Yeah :)</p>

<p>So Rick did another list and then DeAnn did it and then I did it so here 'tis.  (And they, um, call it a Meme when you get an idea from someone and pass it along. I read that in Daniel Dennet and Douglas Hofstadter's "The Mind's I")</p>

<p><B>Ten movies I'd watch over and over</B> (I can't watch movies over and over any more but I did in High School so these are the ones I watched :)<br />
1. Disney's Robin Hood (1970's cartoon, starring the cast from The Jungle Book)<br />
2. Disney's Alice in Wonderland<br />
3. " Sleeping Beauty<br />
4. Hot to Trot (Bob(cat) Goldthwait before the long hair, and John Candy as the voice of a horse)<br />
5. Wizard of Oz<br />
6. It's a Wonderful Life (ok ok that was college)<br />
7. Tron (it kept coming on TV)<br />
8. The Explorers (ditto)<br />
9. Flight of the Navigator (dittoditto)<br />
10. Back to the Future II & III (I didn't have a copy of I *cry*)</p>

<p><B>Nine [groups of] people I enjoy the company of</B> (touchy subject, like thanking people at an acceptance speech ;)<br />
1. Mah Family! <br />
2. Mah Church Gr&#0252;p<br />
3. The Bend.com Cr&#0252;<br />
4. The Webformix Cr&#0252; (+ Chris + Gene when we don't brawl ;)<br />
5. The Coblogging folkz<br />
5. My friends' parents have a habbit of being uncommonly cool (the Graybers, Ozrelics, Gardeners, Merydiths)<br />
7. People who used to be in the above groups but are no longer: Phil, Arriene, Vince, Jerry, Mike.<br />
8. Muh Cat (see? he likes to play with the string! purrpurr :)<br />
9. Everyone who doesn't come to mind right now for whatever reason (cop out! heh ;)</p>

<p><B>Eight things I'm wearing</B> (oh my. how scintillating. *barf*)<br />
1. Tee-shirt (golf balls can be launched from it)<br />
2. jeenz<br />
3. socks<br />
4. shoes<br />
5. um.. hanes?<br />
6. wedding ring<br />
7. engagement ring <br />
8. glasses</p>

<p><B>Seven things on my mind</B>:<br />
1. . o O ( Who cares what I'm wearing? )<br />
2. . o O ( Wiki Breakfast Cereal! )<br />
3. . o O ( I wonder if I have pings on this thing fixed? Am I hafta go beat up orblogs again? at least they have my favicon in there now :)<br />
4. . o O ( House clean, back to church in morning. Note to self, avoid wearing shirts with cat pee stains on them. Last week was a nightmare. )<br />
5. . o O ( Eternal Sunshine was not a bad film. Most of their treatment of how memory works was accurate. It was kind of like if Memento and Punch Drunk Love had an illegitimate love-child-film. )<br />
6. . o O ( Nine things.. eight things.. seven things.. hey, this is a big countdown, hunh? :)<br />
7. . o O ( I think albinoblacksheep is cool. Maybe I should make a cartoon and schlep it in thar. )</p>

<p><B>Six objects I touch every day</B> (excluding the most incidental things I can; 'touch' as in 'try to use' for some clear goal or another :)<br />
1. computer keyboards & mice<br />
2. car keys (and I throw them :)<br />
3. food / utensils / cups<br />
4. money / cards (often to buy food.. I can't cook ;)<br />
5. books / magazines<br />
6. TV remote (I'll bet I use it every day.. but I am ashamed :{ )</p>

<p>Five things I do every day:<br />
1. eat<br />
2. sleep<br />
3. read<br />
4. compute<br />
5. pontificate</p>

<p><B>Four bands or musicians that you couldn't live without</B>: (if you're still not offended then I'll throw in John Tesh; but I don't listen to him very much ;)<br />
1. Strong Bad<br />
2. TMBG<br />
3. Enya<br />
4. Eminem</p>

<p><B>Three of your favorite songs at this moment</B>:<br />
1. "You're a girl.. or maybe a wagon, filled up with pancakes" - Strong Bad<br />
2. "She will be loved" - Maroon 5<br />
3. "The Promise" - When In Rome</p>

<p>Two people who have influenced your life the most:<br />
1. MacGuyver<br />
2. My Gramma</p>

<p>One person who you love more than anyone in the world:<br />
1. My Darla, hands down :)   (after that is my son, Christian)</p>

<p>fin!</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nintendo Dual Screen</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000123.html" />
    <modified>2004-11-13T23:10:18Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-11-13T15:10:18-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.123</id>
    <created>2004-11-13T23:10:18Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Nintendo has come out with a new portable game device to put the Gameboy Advance SP to bed. It&apos;s called Nintendo DS, and DS stands for Dual Screen. It is actually a clamshell with dual 3-inch lcd screens. Both are...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Nintendo has come out with <A HREF='http://www.nintendods.com/'>a new portable game device</A> to put the Gameboy Advance SP to bed.</p>

<p>It's called Nintendo DS, and DS stands for Dual Screen. It is actually a clamshell with dual 3-inch lcd screens. Both are capable of antialiased 3d rendering of up to 120,000 polygons per second; putting it between the rendering capabilities of the N64 and the Gamecube. </p>

<p>The lower screen is also touch ensitive, and can be operated with a stylus or a finger.</p>

<p>Here is an animation showcasing one stylus-ready title called <A HREF='http://albinoblacksheep.com/flash/nintendogs.php'>Nintendogs</A>. Compare the 3D rendering quality with what you've seen in commercials of the Nokia N-gage, which looks like a tiny-resolution PS1. The DS will also allow wireless multiplayer gaming with up to 16 players.</p>

<p>Here is the <A HREF='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_ds'>Wikipedia article</A> about the DS.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google v. MSN beta search</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000122.html" />
    <modified>2004-11-12T08:29:23Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-11-12T00:29:23-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.122</id>
    <created>2004-11-12T08:29:23Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">This press release trumpets MSN&apos;s new Google killing search feature, and this MSN search makes it clear who Microsoft feels is more evil than satan. You&apos;ll notice that they themselves rank only 3rd and 4th :) (belated thanks to Barney...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p><A HREF='http://marketdata.qtrade.ca/newspaper.asp?Mode=losers&Story=20041111/316p5653.xml'>This press release</A> trumpets MSN's new Google killing search feature, and <A HREF='http://beta.search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=more+evil+than+satan'>this MSN search</A> makes it clear who Microsoft feels is more evil than satan. You'll notice that they themselves rank only 3rd and 4th :)  <I>(belated thanks to <A HREF='http://releaseme.squarespace.com'>Barney</A> and <A HREF='http://utterlyboring.com/'>Jake</A> for this info! ;)</I></p>

<p>The only thing M$N provides that looks new is the "near me" button. I tried it. I typed "kennels" and it led me immediately to <A HREF='http://www.coinet.com/'>Coinet</A> and <A HREF='http://www.cuttingedgewebs.com/portfolio.htm'>Cutting Edge Webs</A>.</p>

<p>Later that day, I found out that Google has something similar to the "near me" button, but much &#0151; oh much &#0151; better.</p>

<p>It's called <A HREF='http://local.google.com/'>Google Local</A>. You can type what you want to search for, and then where you want to search for it. No faulty geotargeting and you could search for business near a remote destination. That and of course it is accurate. Bleedingly accurate. It will give you business names, phone numbers, addresses, even if they have no website. It will plot them effortlessly onto a map. Here is what Google has to say about the service:</p>

<p><BLOCKQUOTE>Sometimes the information you're looking for is related to a particular place &#0151; like the all-night doughnut shop that's nearest to your house. Google Local locates neighborhood stores and services by searching billions of pages across the Web, then cross-checking those results with Yellow Pages data to pinpoint the local resources you want to find. This innovative approach gives you access to the most &#0151; and most relevant &#0151; results for your search.<br />
</BLOCKQUOTE></p>

<p>But there's more!</p>

<p>It would take a geek like me to try this, but where they say "where" and you can type your city and state, or as the above text insinuates, your zip code... or you can totally type your whole address! When you do this, <B STYLE='font-size: larger; '>it puts a little house icon right on the map!!!</B> Booya, driving directions a la carte.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Interesting thoughts on wiki&apos;s</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/archives/000121.html" />
    <modified>2004-11-01T10:02:58Z</modified>
    <issued>2004-11-01T02:02:58-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.lightsecond.com,2004:/bbt8/1.121</id>
    <created>2004-11-01T10:02:58Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Thanks to Barney for This Link, which I aim to pick apart. Unlike the other trackbacks and comments to this article so far, I neither personally know Rebecca MacKinnon nor have I followed her career. I know a thing or...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>jesse</name>
      
      <email>jesset@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lightsecond.com/bbt8/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Thanks to <A HREF='http://www.bend.com/'>Barney</A> for <A HREF='http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/'>This Link</A>, which I aim to pick apart. Unlike the other trackbacks and comments to this article so far, I neither personally know Rebecca MacKinnon nor have I followed her career. I know a thing or three about wikis, but I've only dabbled in small town journalism on and off since about '93.. So I'm nobody.. but it does not take an expert to perceive some of the flawed observations in this article.</p>

<p>First of all, Rebecca spends way too much time comparing torrents of wiki users to individual journalists. From her piece we learn that "'A journalist' is paid to cover a story, and paid to work past their own personal biases and lack of interest. On the other hand 'A wiki news reporter' has no motivation other than hubris or political slant to go in depth into anything. Ergo 'A journalist' is superior to 'a wiki reporter'. "</p>

<p>While that may be accurate I feel it entirely misses the point. Yes, 'a journalist' is marginally superior to 'a wiki reporter' in the grand scheme. But is not also 'a bear' ridiculously superior to 'a bee'? Yet a colony of africanized honey bees will drop a grizzly out of sheer boredom. The collective biases of several hundred or thousand wiki reporters are more likely to cancel one another out than the biases of a news staff will be affected by the perceptiveness of their audience. Also, since many hands make light work you would be amazed at how small being paid remains a factor to collective motivation.</p>

<p>She does bring out that Wikipedia (and most wiki projects) have a vaguely young, male, developed-country bias. She's annoyed that it has more to say about middle earth than it does about Africa. I on the other hand say that is a spectacularly <B>good</B> thing. Contemporary newspapers and news organizations pay money to send credentialed reporters </I>into</I> places like Africa. They can then brag that they are worldly based on the number of words they've written.. but in a wiki nobody will speak authoratively about Africa unless they are writing <I>from</I> there. There are fewer Africans than Tolkien nerds on the wikipedia, but pretty much zero parachute journalism. Whatever has been said about Africa has been to the point, instead of being leavened by a misguided sense of affirmative action. </p>

<p>Finally she worries about the timing of wiki news. I'm personally wondering what news organization she supports on the other side of the matter. Are there online news sources she would compare with wiki news for timeliness? Most newspapers with affiliated web presences starve their sites to feed their dead-tree investments for as long as they can. She can't be talking about newspapers or network news, since you can't be timelier than your news cycle. If she's at all worried about bias she can't be talking about most 24/7 news channels either. Nobody I know of will prefer Fox News to Wiki News. If there's one fairly respected 24/7 news channel it's CNN, but CNN can only break so many stories at a time no matter how many sibling channels it spawns. Wiki news on the other hand can fight on as many different fronts as it has contributors. CNN can only give you the news that they want to give you. To learn about Mother Teresa's death on CNN you had to wait for breaks in coverage on Lady Di's death. Non-contributors to Wiki News can follow whatever links they would like to view whatever details, sides, or facets of whatever breaking story they would like without being bothered by news that others may see as more important. </p>

<p>All I can report on the matter of wiki timeliness is that I contribute on a tiny wiki which documents and cross references the doings of an internet cartoon called <A HREF='http://homestarrunner.com/'>homestarrunner.com</A>. Late one night, The Brothers Chaps put a secret cartoon on a secret page that absolutely no other things anywhere on the internet pointed to. They did this at 2am, EST. They told NOONE. Nonetheless, it only took 750 seconds for <A HREF='http://www.hrwiki.org'>hrwiki.org</A> to post a complete synopsis, references list, and screenshots.</p>

<p>Hrwiki.org is regularly maintained by about 8 of us goofballs.. so how many wikinews contributors should it take to break a story? Recall the incident where Richard Reid allegedly snuck a shoe bomb onto a passenger airplane. What a swarm of unpaid passengers interested in preserving their lives can do, a swarm of unpaid journalists interested in preserving the truth about events in their local area can also do.</p>

<p>For another example, ask yourselves where the footage from the impact of the first airplane on 9/11 came from. Televised news has shown us this entirely unforeseen event from multiple angles. Without researching the matter, I can feel safe stating that none of that footage was from news cameras. At that fateful moment, (as at most similar moments) there were zero news cameras and at least a dozen recreational cameras trained at that point in the sky. When an event occurs, you cannot expect the eyes of a reporter to be there to witness it.. but you can expect somebody’s eyes to be there.. perhaps many somebodys'.. and as net-saviness expands, some of those people — who are not and cannot be paid to do so — will contribute their experience to a wiki. </p>

<p>Wiki for any purpose is the electronic upgrade to word of mouth. When you ask somebody about something, and they say they haven't heard of it, you fill them in on what you know. The advantage of a wiki over gossip is of course the superiority of the medium. Instead of half-heard, half-forgotten stories; everything is shared in black and white, ne'er to fade. Instead of variant stories that waft beyond the control of those that know better, the story is right there and can be reigned in by anyone with superior factual knowledge. Previous versions are there waiting for vindication in case the last contributor's "knowledge" wasn't quite so factual. </p>

<p>Thus, wikis for reference in general and for news in particular possess the speed of gossip, the veracity of indefinite fact checking, the availability of the internet (fast surplanting the worldwide penetration ratios of the telephone), and the maximum insight, professionalism, and credentials of the best endowed contributors to any given work. I refuse to challenge anyone to point me towards a news organization who can claim even remotely similar properties as it would be an unfairly rhetorical exercise.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>